Today’s question is presented for consideration at the end of a part of the multi-party political tradition of the present democratic society. Our constitution has given us the gift of multi-party political system, in which every citizen can serve the country to the best of his ability. Has the multi-party political system contributed to the upliftment of society? Why has the winning candidate become a product in the multi-party political system today? Why in the multi-party political system, from time to time, the “winning candidates” have stood for sale? What kind of democratic system are we living in that the candidates selected by us negotiate for their own benefit after their victory? Is this system right for the future of our democratic society? The words mentioned above are extremely annoying, but it is also a reality in our present society, why some parties only work to cut votes in elections? Do some parties not mislead the society with their illegal statements and untrue figures? Why  do some politicians become traders after winning elections? Did our ancestors hold these dreams for the establishment of democratic society? No! The policy rules that were framed by our ancestors for the general elections were appropriate according to that time, but in today’s political environment, a clear need for change in multi-party practice is being felt. Today, it is often seen that the politics of our society is becoming business. Admittedly, democratic rule in our constitution is based on “majority figures”, but every time the scene of juggling these figures emerges in society, is it the right face of democracy? Is this not a slap of this kind of juggling on democracy society? Ever since politics has become a source of income rather than service, the arithmetic of some political parties of the country has remained for the addition and subtraction. Have not these honorable politicians mocked the definition of democratic society? Does not the foundation of democracy seem to be oppressed by today’s multi-party system? Does this system not create a state of confusion in society? The society has no objection to the multi-party political system. This is an integral part of the beauty of democratic society. Today’s question means that before the general elections, all political parties should choose their group. Their contract remained unchanged till the announcement of the upcoming election, so that the countrymen remember that they are giving their valuable votes to the candidate of which group. With such a constitutional system in the society, words like party-change and horse-trading in politics are sure to end and the society will get democratic powers only for the fixed constitutional period.  With all these burning questions, today’s question (aaj ka prashn) seems to be necessary to motivate the inclusion of amendments in the developmental depiction of democratic background that,

Q 49:

Why Opposition is weak in multiparty politics? Has the present multi-party politics become a market?

    If you agree with the question, why and what should be the changes? If you disagree then why?

    Think, and write your opinion in limited words for the change in the nation and your society or do express your views by pressing the button of “agree and disagree”.

Intention:

    The contemplation of the present democratic society is inevitable on today’s question, because the present multi-party politics has made many misleading attacks on the true nature of democratic society due to its selfishness, which has afflicted the society. This agony of society motivates us that we should take a break from the politics that has become market. Shouldn’t this tradition change, so that the country can have better development? Should society not contemplate the implementation of a bipartisan electoral system?

    The present multi-party political system has violated the rules of democratic society many times by serving its personal interests. Every countryman has experienced that some of the selected leaders have misused constitutional rights for their selfishness by doing political gimmicks. Therefore, the society should think about changes in this multi-party electoral system, so that the elections in the society are conducted only in the pro-opposition system. For this, every political party should make a contract with a political party with its ideological quality before the general election, this contract should be held till the announcement of the next general election. With such a constitutional rule, the society will get a bilateral political system, so that the people will be able to choose their suitable politicians and every citizen will get the right information on all the burning topics of the society. Is this political system not enough for the countrymen? Why should society listen to unnecessary things of pseudo leaders?  We have to think…. We have to write…. We have to change….!!!

    There is noise in society today that “Opposition is weak, Opposition is scattered”. The society has gained the experience that the country’s opposition is weak and scattered in individual political ambitions and multi-party tradition, due to which they have been unable to give their best. When all the parties join the groups of the parties and the opposition and do the politics of the same statement, then the opposition will never be scattered and weak, which is very important for a democratic society. If any independent candidate also stands in this episode, then he will have to announce in advance that he will join the particular group after winning. With this kind of transparency, the opinion of every citizen will become valuable and help in the progress of the society and political chaos will also be reduced by the selection of right candidates in the society. Such bilateral politics will give strong opposition to the country, which is very important for the national interest and politics will be saved from becoming a business. That is why today’s question:  Why Opposition is weak in multiparty politics? Has the present multi-party politics become a market? Is presented with all the respect to public table for discussion. Jay Hind !!! Jay Bharat !!!

Request:

    Your views or suggestions may be useful on this issue. Please write down your views or suggestion in the comment box of the blogs or cast your vote. Your views/suggestions are forwarded to the high constitutional authorities of the nation. It might be that government may implement it by taking in consideration. With such hope, put your views. Thanking you.